Tuesday, March 1, 2011

Argentinian Land Bubble?

Longtime readers will know that I have long favored South America as an investment destination for agricultural products. Interest in all things agricultural has only grown with the advent of high food prices.

Type in buy farmland in Argentina on Google and you will face tens of thousands of hits. Most of the results are of dubious value and years old. However, I received a story today from a credible source that is pertinent.


Argentina Should Limit Foreigners' Farmland Purchases - Minister
Pressure is building in Argentina to limit the amount of land that foreigners can buy as record prices for grain and derivative products fuel concerns that deep-pocketed overseas investors might end up controlling a significant percentage of the country's farmland.

Last year, congressmen from a across Argentina's political spectrum sponsored about 12 different bills that would have put limits on foreign land ownership. While those bills are stalled in the agriculture commission of Argentina's lower house, the administration of President Cristina Fernandez looks set to weigh in on the issue.

"[Fernandez] believes that the legislature needs to debate the protection of the country's primary non-renewable strategic resource--the land," Agriculture Minister Julian Dominguez said in a speech on Sunday.

The land "has to stay in Argentine hands," Dominguez said.

Agriculture exports were largely responsible for Argentina's whopping $12.06 billion trade surplus last year, while taxes on farm exports accounted for a significant percentage of the federal government's tax revenue. Argentina is the world leader in soymeal and soyoil exports, ranks No. 2 in corn exports, and third in soybeans.

As global commodity prices soar, investors have increasingly looked to the fertile farmlands of Argentina and Brazil for investment opportunities.

That has helped fuel surging land prices in recent years. At the end of 2010, prime farmland in Argentina's Buenos Aires Province was selling for $15,000 a hectare (2.47 acres), according to local daily La Nacion. That is about double the price in 2007 and over five times prices in 2002 when the country was in the midst of an economic crisis (emphasis my own).

Argentina's northern neighbor, Brazil, has already taken steps to protect its national sovereignty over farmland. Last year, Brazil's former President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva slapped limits on foreign ownership.

Land purchases involving a foreign investor or a local company that is majority owned by foreigners are now reviewed on a case by case basis. Certain limits will apply depending on the geographic area of the purchase.

A similar law is needed in Argentina, where about 7%, or 20 million hectares, of the country's productive farmland is in the hands of foreigners already, said Omar Principe, who heads the land commission at the Argentine Agrarian Federation. The association, know as the FAA, is one of the country's leading farm groups and represents small-scale farmers.


Source: CME News for Tomorrow

Equity Markets Tends To Rise in March



I suppose I would be remiss if I did not take on the bulls' case. Well, here is an interesting note. The S&P 500 as represented by the SPY etf tends to rise in March. See attached chart. I am unsure for the reasons behind the rise and welcome thoughts.

A closer look at the shorter term charts and other market indicators is warranted before making a decision.

Update - Volatility Where Art Thou?




Wow. I have not posted in a long time. I have been pursuing career development (like opening a law practice) in other areas and relegated blogging more or less to a hobby. To say the world has changed a lot since my last post is an understatement. Instead of giving a detailed chronological account of the last few months, I will jump right in and address the current event topics.

The markets have been on a bullish tear since Bernanke made his announcements of Quantitative Easing in late summer/early fall 2010. Since that time, the bulls have been seemingly undeterred by any bearish news. Even the collapse of two Middle Eastern dictators has not done much to stall their advance. However, there are multiple storm clouds on the horizon that would give even the most ardent among the herd a reason to head for shelter.

I see 2 problems looming, Stagflation and European defaults. Neither of these are new but the context in which they are being presented is changing rapidly.

Stagflation
Stagflation is defined as a combination of weak economic growth and high inflation. It is the one threat that has the potential to impede further progress in equities and other risk trades. After all, the recovery trade is more or less done at this point w/most companies having borrowed to buy back their shares (which is my own belief behind the market's advance). While inflation remains relatively low in the West, it is offset by continuing weak labor markets. Instead, inflation is strongest in emerging markets where food and fuel comprise a larger percentage of residents' budgets.

The fundamentals of higher food prices are linked to dietary progressions up the calorie chain for more expensive items. People used to eating rice and lentils have become hungry for chicken and beef. These added demand constraints on farmers and land use has been further exacerbated by volcanic activity in Kamchatka, Russia and colder weather patterns in the Pacific Ocean. Kamchatka is a remote province in the Russian Far East most famous for its large population of bears and elk. But the same geography that is responsible for its geographic isolation is also responsible for a recent spurt in eruptions that have sent hundreds of tons of soot and ash into the atmosphere. La Nina is a reference to the cooler waters in the southern Pacific Ocean that generally lead to drier weather in North and South America.

As any decent farmer knows, the world turns in cycles. (See some of my past posts on El Nino for example) Most of the seasons can be predicted with a great deal of accuracy. But these additional wild card factors are causing substantial changes in heretofore unforseen ways. The changes have resulted in supply constraints that have sent agricultural prices skyrocketing.

European Defaults

Private creditors are not exactly lining up to buy peripheral EU debt. They have their reasons. A case in point is the recent elections in Ireland that saw the outgoing party, Fiana Fail, lose the most within 3 generations. Irish voters were enraged beyond measure about the party that got them into the current mess and wanted to turn them into slaves to foreign creditors. So, why does an election in a country with a population a tiny fraction of the total EU? EU ministers have been promising that all debts will be repaid. Unfortunately Irish voters basically said NO to that idea with a resounding voice. The new govt is likely to push for
a restructuring - a default in all but name. And when that happens the other PIIGS will also want the same thing. What do you think will happen to the markets when a wave of defaults on that scale occurs?

VIX

Ok. Enough fundamentals. Let's talk technicals. After all that's the title of this post. For the purposes of measuring volatility we will look at the S&P 500 Vix (volatility options index). I like the vix because it is about as pure a mathematical indicator as you can get. It has been alternately called the fear index b/c when the vix spikes, it indicates nervousness among options buyers on the S&P 500 stock options prices.

So, how To Protect Against Volatility?

I have put up several charts of the vix which indicate a potential spike in volatility over the next few months. Note the ATR (average true range) and standard deviation indicators. Like all options, vix options pricing reflects market sentiment by the sellers for future months. Outright buying vix options (in this case calls) 3,4,5 months in the future seems feasible at first until you consider that the only way to make a profit on those is by having the rate of change accelerate dramatically (preferably in the near term). To some extent this is true of any options buyer but the vix is different b/c the underlying values change for every month. In turn this is due to reversion to the mean as measured by standard deviation - which is more volatile by far than the vast majority of stocks or commodities.

The vix also spends most of its time in contango - a term used to describe the larger premiums demanded for far off months than compared to near month contracts.(Vix futures can be priced for backwardation but this happens less often - usually when the vix is already flying next to black swans -look no further than the September 2008-March 2009). The reason for this can be readily explained by looking at the vix over a long period of time. While the vix can and does readily revert to the mean, it can spike significantly in the short term and even stay there for protracted periods of time. The higher priced premiums are the result of options sellers demanding suitable compensation for taking on that level of risk.

So, what to do as a trader or even a hedger looking to protect against a fat tail event? In (relatively) low volatility times, debit (put) spreads on index etfs or leading stocks seem to be the way to go. There is limited risk but limited upside (of course the upside can still be considerable). Premium selling strategies are not worth it with low volatility. Of course, one can always buy calls or puts (well in this case puts if you favor a sustained market correction). You still have to be right with both trades (debit spreads and straight options buying) but at least volatility is favoring the options buyers.

Thursday, August 5, 2010

The Debts of the Spenders: The Stock Bulls Do Have a Case. Kind Of.

The stock bulls have a fair value case. I know its not trendy to talk fundamentals anymore but bear with me. With interest rates so low, the P/E values don't look so bloated anymore.

If interest rates are double digits, the present value of a dollar that you're going to receive in the future from an investment is not nearly as high as the present value of a dollar if rates are 4% (which happens to be the rate of a 30 year treasury). In other words, a dollar of future profit becomes that much more valuable.

There has also been much talk about Bernanke restarting the bond purchase program again. This is synonymous with steady low rates.

And many companies are sitting on cash hoards. That means they wil either have to invest in plant/equipment, labor (hah!), or start giving out bigger dividends.

http://www.cfo.com/article.cfm/14508819/c_14511422?f=home_todayinfinance

In fact, with bond yields so low and some asset classes like mortgage securities trading above par, then it seems buying a bunch of blue chip stocks that yield consistent divvies is the way to go. Just stuff them in your IRA and wait for capital appreciation. Few financial advisors will tell you this because they can't make any commissions off this strategy.

I also urge readers to look at this article for some historical context. Note the year it was published:

http://www.safehaven.com/article/7721/interest-rates-and-market-valuation
*Credit goes to Kauneongal for the IRA strategy.

Tuesday, August 3, 2010

The Debts of the Lenders: China on the Soapbox Again About US Treasuries

More harsh rhetoric about US fiscal profligacy. Chinese buyers, represented mostly by the state, are growing increasingly vocal in their criticism for the US to follow a European style austerity plan. . . . or else.

“I do not think U.S. Treasuries are safe in the medium-and long-run,” Yu, a
member of the state-backed Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, wrote yesterday
in an e-mailed response to questions. China is unable to sell the securities in
a “big way” and a “scary trajectory” of budget deficits and a growing supply of
U.S. dollars put their value at risk, he said.

“China has to depend more on demand and supply in the foreign exchange
market for the determination of the yuan exchange rate,” Yu wrote. “Only God
knows how much value that China has stored in the U.S. government securities
will be left in the future when China needs to run down its reserves.”

“The U.S. government has strong incentives to reduce its real burden of
debt through inflation and dollar devaluation,” he said. “Whichever way it is,
the yuan-recorded market value of Treasuries will fall, causing huge capital
losses to China’s central bank.”


http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-08-03/treasuries-lack-safety-liquidity-for-china-yu-says.html

Sunday, August 1, 2010

The Debts of the Lenders: China's Silk Road to Latin America

Great article from Bloomberg.

“The potential for inter-emerging market trade is ginormous,” said Jim
O’Neill
, chief economist at Goldman Sachs Group Inc. in London, who coined
the term BRIC in 2001 to describe the rising role of Brazil, Russia, India and
China. “That makes it quite difficult to see how you get a sustained global
recession because of what’s going on in the west.”


http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-08-01/new-silk-road-built-by-china-binds-asia-to-latin-america-with-global-trade.html

Saturday, July 24, 2010

The Debts of the Spenders: The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“WSRCPA”)

Just a quick overview of the recent US financial reform laws. The changes are sweeping and this is not meant in any way to be comprehensive. Updates will be posted as changes are made.

The law is formally known as the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“WSRCPA”). Readers interested in the Too Big To Fail aspect should focus on Title 2 (see below).

The Banking Lobbyists' perspective:

http://www.aba.com/RegReform/default.htm

For a timeline of when the rules will be effective:

http://www.aba.com/aba/documents/RegReform/EffectiveDatesChart.pdf

The other ABA (American Bar Association - which is not to be confused with the American Bankers Association) also has its own views and is having several upcoming programs:

http://www.abanet.org/cle/programs/t10nfr1.html

One of the biggest changes is the introduction of the OLA, or Orderly Liquidation Authority, which REPLACES Bankruptcy Court under the auspices of the FDIC (the OLA is part of the FDIC) under Title 2. The OLA will be responsible for probating the "living wills" of too big to fail institutions. All legal challenges will fall under the APA (Administrative Procedure Act) which governs nearly all federal agencies - (you can be sure there will be plenty of legal challenges being filed in the coming months).

Also, many of the aspects covered in the Cadwalader (a major white shoe law firm) legal memo made it to the final law.

http://www.cadwalader.com/assets/client_friend/072010_DF2.pdf

http://www.cadwalader.com/assets/client_friend/072010_DF1.pdf